Multi-Unit Franchise Opportunities: Debunking Industry Myths
Expanding into multi-unit franchising is an attractive growth strategy for many entrepreneurs. However, common misconceptions about the industry often deter prospective of a prospective multi-unit franchise.
This article will explore and debunk some of the most prevalent myths about multi-unit franchising. From accessibility for small business owners to transferability down the road, we will separate fact from fiction when it comes to multi-location ownership.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
1. Multi-unit franchising is accessible to small business owners, not just big corporations.
2. Newer franchise brands can offer advantages despite being riskier than proven concepts.
3. Franchise owners can manage dispersed locations with remote capabilities.
4. Steady, paced growth is smarter than rapid, aggressive expansion.
Myth #1. Franchise Expansion Is Only For Large Corporations
A common myth is that multi-unit franchising is reserved only for large corporations with massive capital. In reality, many multi-location opportunities are accessible to regular small business owners, too. Established franchise brands, like some of the best multi-unit franchises actively seek owners of all sizes to strategically expand their concepts.
They often provide discounts on fees or incentives for owners who commit to steady unit growth over time. An entrepreneur doesn’t need hundreds of thousands in capital to invest in their first few locations. With careful planning and phased scaling, the initial investment can be reasonable for qualified franchisees.
Myth #2. It’s Risky To Expand Newer Franchise Brands
Another misconception is that newer franchise brands are too risky for scalable growth. While proven concepts with years of success make the safest bets, emerging brands with strong corporate experience and proof of concept can still offer advantages. Thorough vetting and due diligence are required when the brand is unproven.
However, negotiating contract terms highly favorable to franchisees can help mitigate risks. Newer brands have incentives to offer enhanced support, training, flexibility, and incentives to fuel early expansion. Once the concept gains traction, room for growth may be more limited.
Myth #3. All Locations Must Be Geographically Close
Many assume that franchise owners in this kind of business must keep all their locations concentrated in the same region. However, dispersed territories are common in larger multiple enterprises. Savvy operators assemble geographic clusters under regional managers but also take advantage of expansion opportunities in secondary markets.
Remote management capabilities and technologies make it equally feasible to operate units spread across states or regions under a single ownership entity. This geographic diversification can help multi-unit franchisees capitalize on the best territories and locations.
Myth #4. Multi-Unit Franchisees Are Absentee Owners
A prevailing myth also depicts franchisees in this space as passive, absentee owners who leave operations entirely to hired staff. Hands-on oversight and involvement are still critical at each franchise location. The franchisee can’t replace the role of qualified unit-level managers who handle day-to-day operations.
However, the owner’s responsibility is to provide strategic direction, management support, and high-level oversight across the entire business. Assembling an experienced operations team to maintain excellent execution is how franchisees in this space successfully scale their enterprises.
Myth #5. Growth Must Be Rapid
Some also assume unit expansion must happen quickly to scale a multiple franchise brand properly. However, controlled, strategic franchise growth is usually ideal. Opening many locations simultaneously strains resources and makes it harder to ensure each unit thrives.
It’s smarter to establish solid operations before pursuing aggressive expansion. They are also better off gradually acquiring territories and steadily opening locations at a manageable pace. Slow, stable growth eases the integration of new units.
Myth #6. Franchisors Want “Small” Multi-Unit Franchisees
Franchisors are likewise often perceived as preferring “small” multi-unit franchisees, but the opposite is typically true. Most established brands actively seek well-capitalized, experienced business partners capable of adding many locations in a territory.
They also require candidates to demonstrate operational expertise and access to sufficient financing to support steady expansion. In exchange, franchisors offer larger, proven multi-unit operators sweetened deals and incentives to grow the brand rapidly. These mutually beneficial partnerships are key to franchisors’ development plans.
Myth #7. Franchises Can’T Sell Or Transfer Units
Another common fallacy within this niche is that agreements prohibit later selling or transferring ownership of units. In reality, most established brands do allow transferability under certain conditions.
Franchisees can often sell individual locations or even an entire multi-unit enterprise to qualified buyers. The franchisor typically retains the right of first refusal to buy back units if desired. But with proper planning, franchise owners absolutely have options to recover equity down the road.
Myth #8. Franchisors Won’T Negotiate Contract Terms
A prevalent myth is that franchisors push rigid boilerplate contracts that won’t allow negotiation on terms. In reality, established brands are often willing to negotiate aspects of the agreement, especially for proven multi-unit partners.
While the core of the franchise agreement may be standardized, certain clauses around fees, exclusivity, transferability, renewals, and termination are open to discussion. Franchisors know compromising on certain terms is worthwhile to secure a committed franchisee capable of significant growth.
An experienced franchise lawyer can get concessions to provide more favorable conditions for the franchisee’s long-term benefit. Multi-unit candidates with strong leverage shouldn’t assume contracts are non-negotiable.
Myth #9. Each Unit Must Be Identical
Many believe franchisors rigidly dictate that each unit must follow an utterly uniform format. However, smart franchisors build flexibility for multi-unit owners to tailor locations to their local markets. Minor adjustments to menus, pricing, marketing, technologies, or décor may be sanctioned based on geography, demographics, and psychographics.
While brand standards ensure cohesiveness, franchisors recognize that regional preferences exist. Multi-unit owners gain opportunities to localize and customize units when beneficial without compromising the core brand identity. These nuances enhance performance.
Myth #10. Scaling Too Fast Helps Maximize Profits
A common myth contends that the faster franchise owners scale, the quicker they’ll maximize overall profits. However, too-rapid expansion can spread resources thin and actually undermine profitability if units struggle. It’s wiser to open just enough locations to comfortably manage based on your capabilities. Ensure each unit maintains excellent performance before stretching capacity.
Support infrastructure often needs to be developed in parallel with adding locations. Franchising within this space is a marathon requiring disciplined, self-controlled growth. Franchisees scaling too fast risk brand reputation and unit economics suffering. Mature multi-unit organizations know smart, steady expansion wins over reckless speed. Protecting profitability should take priority over rushing to maximize units.
The Final Take…
By debunking common myths about multi-unit franchising, prospective franchisees gain clarity on the realities and can make informed decisions. With realistic expectations, proper due diligence, and a pragmatic growth strategy, multi-unit expansion is an achievable goal for dedicated entrepreneurs across industries and scales.
Read Also: